Though the Zodiac killer’s case remains unsolved, it has piqued Hollywood’s fascination for years, with David Fincher’s 2007 film Zodiac serving as the most prominent depiction. The movie is frequently praised as one of the most historically accurate films based on true events. Of course, it still takes certain liberties and leaves out important details. Here are some of the things that Zodiac gets right about the case, as well as some of the things that it gets wrong.
Kristen Palamara updated this page on February 7th, 2021: Although David Fincher’s Zodiac was released in 2007, it was a very thorough portrayal of the real-life events of the Zodiac murders, which spanned decades. Robert Graysmith, a cartoonist at the newspaper where the Zodiac Killer frequently sent letters, was involved in the events and grew obsessed with solving the case. Zodiac, directed by David Fincher, is a well-researched film that strives to stay as near to the truth as possible, yet there are some deviations between reality and the film.
In This Article...
In actual life, who was the Zodiac Killer?
The Zodiac Killer was the moniker of an unidentified serial killer who terrorized Northern California in the late 1960s. The case has been dubbed “America’s most famous unsolved murder case,” having become a part of popular culture and prompting amateur investigators to try to solve it.
Between December 1968 and October 1969, the Zodiac murdered five people in the San Francisco Bay Area, in rural, urban, and suburban settings. His known attacks took place in Benicia, Vallejo, unincorporated Napa County, and the city of San Francisco proper, where he targeted young couples and a lone male cab driver. Two of his intended victims made it out alive. The Zodiac claimed responsibility for the murders of 37 people, and he’s been linked to a number of additional cold cases, some in Southern California and others beyond the state.
The Zodiac came up with the term in a series of taunting letters and cards he sent to local media, threatening murder sprees and bombs if they didn’t print them. Cryptograms, or ciphers, were included in some of the letters, in which the killer claimed to be gathering his victims as slaves for the hereafter. Two of his four ciphers have yet to be cracked, and one took 51 years to crack. While various speculations have been proposed as to the identity of the killer, Arthur Leigh Allen, a former elementary school teacher and convicted sex offender who died in 1992, was the only suspect ever publicly recognized by authorities.
Despite the fact that the Zodiac stopped communicating in writing around 1974, the peculiar character of the case piqued international interest, which has persisted throughout the years. The case was deemed “inactive” by the San Francisco Police Department in April 2004, although it was reopened before March 2007. The investigation is still ongoing in Vallejo, as well as Napa and Solano counties. Since 1969, the California Department of Justice has had an open case file on the Zodiac murders.
Is the movie Zodiac 2007 based on a true story?
The 2007 thriller Zodiac, based on the horrific true story of the Zodiac Killer, has just been uploaded to Netflix.
Marc Ruffalo, Jake Gyllenhaal, and Robert Downey Jr. feature in the film. It’s a fictionalized account of true events recounted through the eyes of a political cartoonist during the time. Here’s the genuine story of the Zodiac Killer, which was recently added to Netflix.
In Zodiac, who was the guy in the basement?
Robert Graysmith couldn’t resist his curiosity on a rainy September night in 1978.
An anonymous phone call about the identity of the Zodiac, the legendary Bay Area serial murderer, had been received by the San Francisco Chronicle cartoonist a month before. At the outset of an hour-long chat, the mystery voice said, “He’s a person named Rick Marshall.” The serial killer’s spate of murders had gone unsolved since 1969, but Graysmith had a new clue. Marshall, a former projectionist at The Avenue Theater, had stashed evidence from his five victims inside movie canisters that he’d rigged to explode, according to the informant. The anonymous caller instructed Graysmith to locate Bob Vaughn, a silent film organist who worked with Marshall, before hanging up. Graysmith discovered that the booby-trapped canisters had recently been transferred to Vaughn’s house. “Get to Vaughn,” said the voice. “See if he warns you not to go near any of his movie collection.”
Graysmith went into Marshall’s history after years of working separately on the case and discovered significant coincidences. His new suspect was a fan of The Red Spectre, an early-century film mentioned in a Zodiac letter from 1974, and had used a teletype machine similar to the killer. Marshall’s felt-pen posters outside The Avenue Theater even contained calligraphy that was comparable to the Zodiac’s strange, cursive strokes. Graysmith witnessed Vaughn playing the Wurlitzer and the Zodiac’s crosshair symbol plastered to the theater’s ceiling on his occasional visits to the upscale movie house. There were just too many indications that overlapped. He needed to get to Vaughn’s residence. “We realized there was a connection,” Graysmith says. “I was paralyzed with fear.”
Graysmith’s nightmarish encounter was converted into one of the creepiest movie scenes of all time by filmmaker David Fincher almost three decades later. It happens near the end of Zodiac, as Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal) drives Vaughn (Charles Fleischer) home in his bright-orange Volkswagen Rabbit through the rain. The atmosphere rapidly becomes unsettling once inside. Vaughn brings a scared Graysmith down to his dimly lit basement after revealing that he, not Marshall, is responsible for the movie poster handwriting. The floorboards above Graysmith groan as the organist looks through his nitrate film records, implying the presence of someone. Graysmith races upstairs to the closed front door, rattling the handle, before Vaughn slowly pulls out his key and opens it from behind, after Vaughn convinces his guest that he lives alone. Graysmith dashes into the downpour, as if he’s just escaped the hands of the Zodiac.
In the end, the encounter in the third act is a red herring. Vaughn was never thought to be a serious suspect. However, in a film full of routine cop work and dead ends, just five minutes of tense tension transform a procedural into actual horror. The moment represents a culmination of Graysmith’s neurotic preoccupation with the Zodiac’s identitya glimpse into the life-threatening lengths and depths to which he’ll go to solve the caseas well as a brief rejection of the film’s otherwise objective gaze. “It’s actually so distinct from the rest of the movie,” explains Zodiac screenwriter James Vanderbilt. “It does give you that jolt that a lot of the movie is attempting to avoid.”
Simply put, the basement sequence is a classic Fincher adrenaline rush, bolstered by years of meticulous research, meticulous attention to detail, and last-minute studio foresight. Graysmith still gets shivers when he sees the movie, even though it was released thirteen years ago.
Why did the Zodiac Killer choose that name for himself?
The press began to refer to him as the ‘Zodiac Killer,’ but it is unclear why the killer chose that moniker.
In addition, he would sign his letters with a circle and a cross over it, which resembled a target or a coordinate symbol.
The signature symbols, according to authorities, were designed to symbolize coordinates that could indicate future killing locations.
Is Zodiac no longer available on Netflix?
There’s never been a better time to catch up on your Netflix queue than now, thanks to a certain global pandemic. It’s easy to miss the best films due to the rapid churn of movies coming and going from the streaming service. But maybe, thanks to this post, true crime enthusiasts will be able to catch one of the best films in the category before it exits Netflix later this week.
On March 19, 2020, David Fincher’s Zodiac (2007) will be removed off Netflix (this Thursday). But hold on! Before you go streaming Zodiac in the background as you “work from home,” consider the following reasons why this film deserves your entire attention.
Is Arthur Leigh Allen a real person or a fictional character?
Yes, but not in the way that the film depicts it. Robert Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal) confronts his primary suspect, Arthur Leigh Allen, inside a hardware store where Allen works towards the end of the film Zodiac. “…I’m following around in an orange VW Rabbit and I park outside of Ace Hardware and obviously he’s seen me from the big window and so I’m parked and he pulls alongside me so I can’t get my door open and he gives me this look like you wouldn’t believe,” Graysmith said in an interview with RopeofSilicon. In addition to his parking lot experience with Arthur Leigh Allen, Graysmith sent pals into a Vallejo hardware store to buy products in order to get a sample of Allen’s handwriting. Allen worked at the Ace Hardware in Vallejo for over a decade until he was forced to retire due to diabetic issues shortly before his death in 1992.
What was the signature of the Zodiac killer?
He was a serial murderer who operated in Northern California in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and that’s all we know about him.
In the mysterious letters he wrote to the press throughout his murder spree, he gave himself the moniker “Zodiac.”
The letters frequently began with the phrase “This is the Zodiac speaking,” and contained a variety of cryptograms and insults referring to his planned assassinations.
The letters also included the Zodiac Killer’s now-famous “signature,” a circle with a cross running through it.
Despite the fact that the detectives agree on seven verified victims (two of whom survived), the Zodiac has claimed credit for 37 killings.
Some have even speculated that the Zodiac may be responsible for a few more recent deaths in the San Francisco region.
Others believe the Zodiac Killer mystery is nothing more than a complex fake… But how can we be certain?
Is it possible for a 15-year-old to watch Zodiac?
The majority of the film’s harsher content should be manageable for mature teens aged 16 and over (some swearing, some alcohol and drug abuse). Violence is the true problem here, which is why I think 17 or 18 is a better age to start.