The website provides a selection of daily horoscopes as well as articles on astrology and spiritual insights into star signs. The articles are straightforward but instructive. The horoscopes are truly quite precise and good. If that’s what you’re searching for, the website could be helpful.
When you desire to receive more readings from them, though, the story changes. Then you’ll only get generic stuff that anyone could do. You must first sign up and provide information such as your date of birth, birthplace, marital status, employment position, and gender in order to receive those email readings.
While part of the information sought is necessary for an astrologer to provide you with an accurate reading on your planets, some of the material appears to be excessive, since the astrologer should be allowed to exclude it from the reading. In a reading, for example, the marital status is not required. It’s only required if a media firm wants to sell you relationship readings after determining whether or not you’re single.
New Peak Media begins spamming you every day once they get your information. You’ll get a new email virtually every day with new deals and material, which is impossible to get from a professional astrologer. If they were doing readings for their clients, who would have time to send so many emails? It simply adds to the idea that they merely send out generic content that is the same for everyone, or at the very least for every star sign.
New Peak Media, like most media firms that deal in the metaphysical, psychic, or astrological fields, is pushy when giving out information in order to persuade you to buy. The majority of the methods are dubious, since the emails depict you as having a dismal destiny if you don’t seek aid from themasap.
To put their services to the test, we paid for a real reading using a different email address. With the exception of their names and dates of birth, they were nearly similar. The cost was either $67 or $29 in three installments. The reading is then delivered in a matter of minutes, indicating that there is no astrologer involved in its preparation.
The biggest complaint, of course, is that many clients received generic content that provided them with no genuine value. Each reading includes a marketing for a further reading, which becomes too obtrusive over time. You don’t want to be sold another reading just after you buy one. Allow it to rest for a time.
Given the number of negative comments we’ve seen, it’s evident that many individuals want a refund. Either because they never had a reading or because their reading was completely incomprehensible. The company claims to have a 60-day return policy, but no one has ever received a refund, even when they asked for one.
The paid readings, on the other hand, are useless and have had no effect on anyone’s life till now.
It’s still a bit of a ruse that they include well-known astrologers on their website, but none of them would give you a reading. We may overlook that, but ordering a psychic reading and receiving a generic reading that is the same for everyone is certainly a scam.
It’s also unethical if you order a reading and the content has nothing to do with your life or current circumstances. After all, astrology has been demonstrated to work. As a result, they could do a lot better here!
If you want to find a genuine astrologer who can assist you, do some research, read reviews, and only trust reliable sources. You’ll be able to find exactly what you’re looking for!
In This Article...
Is it true that astrology answers are accurate?
Astrology Answers has been in business for more than a decade. The portal provides individual astrology readings, customised horoscopes, Tarot readings, love compatibility readings, numerology readings, and other forms of spiritual guidance to help users get insight into their life paths.
- Horoscope in Chinese
- Reading for Love Compatibility
- Reading for Career Compatibility
- Compatibility test for pets
- The Numerology of Your Life Path
- Tarot Readings Every Day
In addition to free horoscopes and readings, AstrologyAnswers provides a wealth of information in the form of articles that explain a variety of psychic phenomena and offer spiritual direction.
Continuing with the platform’s trustworthiness, I can mention that Astrology Answers is one of the most popular astrology websites. You can call, chat, or message the advisor of your choice for a reasonable fee. Are the readings, however, accurate?
Is astrology a science or a religion?
Astrology has not been shown useful in controlled research and lacks scientific validity, hence it is classified as pseudoscience.
What was Jesus’ take on astrology?
I believe that God created astrology as a tool for us to better understand ourselves and to use as a spiritual tool. Numerous bible texts, in my opinion, support astrology. As a Christian, I try to remember what Jesus said. “There shall be signs in the sun, moon, and stars,” Christ predicted in Luke 21:25, referring to the importance of astrology. He explains the value of astrology with his pupils, as well as how it might be used as a sign of his return. Why would Jesus provide us this critical knowledge if we are not intended to understand the energies of the planets and signs, and if he was actually against it? Just as the three wise men knew Jesus would be born under the star in the sky that led them to him lying in the manger, Jesus warned us that when he returns, there will be signals in the sky.
Is it true that many believe in astrology?
Christine Smallwood’s fascinating piece, “Astrology in the Age of Uncertainty:
Astrology is currently experiencing widespread popular acceptability that has not been seen since the 1970s. The transition began with the introduction of the personal computer, was expedited by the Internet, and has now reached new levels of speed thanks to social media. According to a Pew Research Center poll from 2017, about a third of Americans believe in astrology.
Astrology, like psychoanalysis before it, has infiltrated our collective lexicon. At a party in the 1950s, you could have heard someone talk about the id, ego, or superego; now, it’s normal to hear someone explain herself using the sun, moon, and rising signs. It isn’t just that you are aware of it. It’s who’s saying it: folks who aren’t kooks or deniers of climate change, who don’t find a conflict between utilizing astrology and believing in science…
I ran a short Google search and discovered the following Pew report from October 2018:
The religion breakdown was the only thing that surprised me about this table.
I had the impression that mainline Protestants were the rational ones, but they believe in astrology at the same rate as the overall population.
But, hey, I guess they’re ordinary Americans, so they have average American ideas.
Only 3% of atheists believe in astrology, which is also unexpected.
This makes sense, yet it seemed reasonable to me that someone may not believe in God but believe in other supernatural things: in fact, I could see astrology as a type of replacement for a traditional religious system.
But it appears that is not the case.
Brian Wansink has been compared to an astrologer who can make astute observations about the world based on a combination of persuasiveness and qualitative understanding, and then attributes his success to tarot cards or tea leaves rather than a more practical ability to synthesize ideas and tell good stories.
Does Brian Wansink, on the other hand, believe in astrology?
What about Marc Hauser, Ed Wegman, Susan Fiske, and the rest of the bunch who call their detractors “second-string, replication police, methodological terrorists, Stasi, and so on?”
I doubt they believe in astrology because it symbolizes a rival belief system: it’s a business that, in some ways, competes with rah-rah Ted-talk science.
I wouldn’t be shocked if famous ESP researchers believe in astrology, but I get the impression that mainstream junk-science supporters in academia and the news media feel uncomfortable discussing ESP since its research methods are so similar to their own.
They don’t want to be associated with ESP researchers because it would devalue their own study, but they also don’t want to put them under the bus because they are fellow Ivy League academics, so the safest plan is to remain quiet about it.
The greater point, however, is not astrology believing in and of itself, but the mental state that allows individuals to believe in something so contrary to our scientific understanding of the world.
(OK, I apologize to the 29% of you who don’t agree with me on this.)
When I return to writing on statistical graphics, model verification, Bayesian computation, Jamaican beef patties, and other topics, you can rejoin the fold.)
It’s not that astrology couldn’t be correct a priori:
We can come up with credible hypotheses under which astrology is real and amazing, just as we can with embodied cognition, beauty and sex ratio, ovulation and voting, air rage, ages ending in 9, and all the other Psychological Science / PNAS classics.
It’s just that nothing has come up after years of rigorous research.
And the existing theories aren’t particularly convincing: they’re speculative world models that may be good if the purpose was to describe a real and enduring occurrence, but they’re less so without actual data.
Anyway, if 30% of Americans are willing to believe such nonsense, it’s no surprise that a significant number of influential American psychology professors will have the kind of attitude toward scientific theory and evidence that leads them to have strong beliefs in weak theories with no supporting evidence.
Indeed, not only support for specific weak theories, but support for the fundamental principle that pseudoscientific views should be treated with respect (although, oddly enough, maybe not for astrology itself).
P.S.In defense of the survey respondents (but not of the psychology professors who support ideas like the “critical positivity ratio,” which makes astrology appear positively sane in comparison), belief in astrology (or, for that matter, belief in heaven, gravity, or the square-cube law) is essentially free.
Why not believe these things, or not believe them?
Belief or denial in evolution, climate change, or unconscious bias, on the other hand, can have social or political consequences.
Some opinions are purely personal, while others have a direct impact on policy.
I have less patience for famous academic and media elites who aggressively support junk science by not just expressing their trust in speculative notions supported by no real data, but also attacking those who point out these emperors’ nudity. Furthermore, even a hypothetical tolerant, open-minded supporter of junk sciencethe type of person who might believe in critical positivity ratio but actively support the publication of criticisms of that workcan still cause some harm by contaminating scientific journals and the news media with bad science, and by promoting sloppy work that takes up space that could be used for more careful research.
You know how they say science corrects itself, but only because individuals are willing to correct themselves?
Gresham’s law is also true, but only when people are willing to distribute counterfeit notes or money they think is counterfeit while keeping their lips shut until they can get rid of their wads of worthless stock.
P.P.S.Just to be clear:I don’t think astrology is a waste of time, and it’s possible that Marc Hauser was onto something real, even while faking data (according to the US government, as mentioned on Wikipedia), and the critical positivity ratio, ovulation, voting, and all the rest…
Just because there isn’t enough evidence to support a theory doesn’t mean it’s untrue.
I’m not trying to disprove any of these assertions.
All of it should be published someplace, along with all of the criticism.
My issue with junk science proponents isn’t simply that they advocate science that I and others perceive to be rubbish; they can also be wrong!
However, they consistently avoid, deny, and oppose valid open criticism.
P.P.P.S.Remember that #notallpsychologists.
Of course, the problem of junk research isn’t limited to psychology in any way.
Professors of political science, economics, sociology, and history, to the extent that they believe in astrology, spoon bending, or whatever (that is, belief in “scientific paranormalism as describing some true thing about the natural world, not just a “anthropological recognition that paranormal beliefs can affect the world because people believe in it), this could also sabotage their research.
I suppose it’s not such a big problem if a physicist or chemist believes in these things.
I’m not attempting to shut down study into astrology, embodied cognition, ESP, beauty-and-sex-ratio, endless soup bowls, spoon bending, the Bible Code, air anger, ovulation and voting, subliminal smiley faces, or anything else.
Allow for the blooming of a thousand blooms!
Given that a sizable portion of the populace is willing to believe in scientific-sounding notions that aren’t backed by any good scientific theory or evidence, it should come as no surprise that many professional scientists hold this viewpoint.
The repercussions are especially evident in psychology, which is a vital field of study where theories can be hazy and where there is a long legacy of belief and action based on flimsy data.
That isn’t to say that psychologists are awful people; they’re merely working on difficult challenges in a field with a long history of failures.
This isn’t a critique; it’s just the way things are. Of course, there is a lot of excellent work being done in the field of psychology. You’ll have to work with what you’ve got.
Is it true that Christians believe in astrology?
Early Christianity supported astrology, but this support waned during the Middle Ages, despite the fact that it still existed. During the Renaissance, support for it rose once more throughout the West.
Is it necessary for me to have an astrology reading?
Astrology is the belief that the locations of the stars and the movement of the planets through the solar system have an impact on human lives, events, and behavior. While you probably already know what your zodiac sign is, studying the important characteristics (as revealed by the zodiac) is essential if you want to improve your self-awareness. You will not only learn how to live your best life, but you will also acquire vital insight into how to live in harmony with others.
To begin, you must first learn how to comprehend astrology: Each of the 12 astrological signs is classified as a quadruplicity (cardinal signs that begin new seasons), mutable (signs that adapt well to change), or fixed sign (one that occurs in the middle of the seasons), as well as a triplicity (a sign associated with one of the four elements: Earth, air, water, or fire). Fire signs are passionate and lively, earth signs are realistic and grounded, air signs are analytical and curious, and water signs are observant and emotional, in a nutshell.
Because there is so much information to process, an astrology reading is always an excellent idea. Trust us when we say that after you learn more about the divine goodness that comes with one, you’ll understand why so many people look to the stars for guidance on life, love, and everything in between.
What makes people obsessed with astrology?
According to religion anthropologist Dr Susannah Crockford of Ghent University in Belgium, “the growing interest in astrology happens at a time of more social instability.” It is natural for people to seek guidance from a higher power during such moments.